MICHAEL
SPENCER HERZOG
17 May 2009
LOVE ONE ANOTHER
How can we possibly be
commanded to love? That’s what Jesus says in that passage
from John’s Gospel: “This is my Commandment
-- that
you love one another.” Doesn’t love just happen? It’s
an emotion and pretty much by definition we are not in control of our
emotions. They happen.
When I was a teenager I worked at
a Howard Johnson’s restaurant in Webster Groves, Missouri.
Howard Johnson’s was known for its many flavors of ice cream.
Their trademark was twenty-eight flavors but there really were more.
Then Baskin-Robbins came out with thirty-one flavors. The Ice
Cream Wars were on! I considered calling this sermon, “Flavors
of Love,” but that seemed excessively cute. I’ve just
finished reading a book on preaching. It advised against cute
sermon titles. So, I won’t call it “Flavors of Love,” but
you can think it. “Flavors of Love” is a pretty good
title, though -- cute or not.
In the Hebrew Scriptures there
are indeed many flavors of love presented -- the erotic love of
Solomon’s Song of Songs, the strong love between two men told in
the story of David and Jonathan, and the loyal and self-sacrificing
love of Ruth and Naomi.
I read somewhere that the Eskimos have
400 words for snow. It turns out that’s not true -- but it’s
a good story all the same. When the New Testament was
translated from Greek into English, all of the different and
distinctive Greek words for love wound up coming out the same single
word, just -- L-O-V-E -- to our eternal confusion.
There
are really many sorts of love -- even more than we have words for.
But, let’s try to keep it simple, to start with anyway. The
Greek language has love divided into parts of three: Eros,
Phileo, and Agape.
Eros -- is romantic love, intimate,
physical, erotic -- heavy breathing. And if you think I’m
going any further with this you’re mistaken. You all get the
idea, I’m sure. It is the kind of love you can fall into --
and fall out of as well.
Eros is a self-centered love.
It is a love of passion. It is an emotional involvement based
on what we sometimes call “chemistry” between two people.
This is not the love we are commanded to practice.
The basis
of eros is that being loved depends on being attractive in some way
to another person. Because of this dependency, eros would be
considered a conditional type of love. There are soaring highs
and crashing lows. It can be a fragile thing -- easily broken
-- especially in its early stages before it gains substance.
That substance can come from Phileo.
Phileo -- is a
companionable love. This love speaks of affection, fondness, or
liking.
It is a love that is called out of one’s
heart as a response to the pleasure one takes in another person.
Phileo is a love that responds to kindness, appreciation, or love
returned. It involves giving as well as receiving. It is strong
but when it is greatly strained, it too can collapse in a crisis.
Phileo might be considered to be a higher love than eros because
it is centered on our
happiness
rather than my
happiness.
Agape
-- refers to the parental love of God for humanity and
humanity for God but is extended to include a brotherly love for all
humanity. Agape includes elements of both eros and phileo in that it
seeks a perfect kind of love that is both a fondness and a passion
without the necessity of it being returned. You shall love --
agape -- the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your
soul, and with all your might, and love your neighbor as yourself.
If eros is conditional love -- agape is unconditional.
Agape is the Love that Paul described in 1 Corinthians 13 -- “Love
is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant
or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or
resentful; it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in
the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all
things, endures all things.
Feeling poetic one time I tried to
add to Paul’s list of the attributes of love -- agape love. I
had reached a point in my life -- in my marriage -- where I had
learned to rely on love. I added to all those “Love is . . .”
statements that love is reliable. When institutions and
acquaintances fail, when art and artifice disappoint -- love is
reliable. I know that sounds a little tame after all those
grand statements -- but it is true and it is important.
We say
that God is love -- it is this love -- agape -- that we’re talking
about. Paul says, love never dies. This equal --
respectful -- caring love is the result of believing (and acting as
though we believe) that all of us are indeed children of God --
precious children of God.
We could divide things up another
way: Eros love is "physical", Phileos love is "mental",
and Agape love is "spiritual". It covers the three
fundamental elements of humanity: BODY -- MIND --
SPIRIT
A few weeks ago we had a couple of experts come
in to speak to us after the worship service about restorative
justice. As I was listening to them talk about the shift away
from punishment and retribution and toward restoration -- to making
things right for the victim -- I realized that this was an example of
the agape love we are commanded to practice. We are not
commanded to make a friend of the person who has harmed us and take
him home for dinner -- but we are required to see him as a precious
child of God and worthy of consideration. We are called upon to
love the unlovable and forgive the unforgivable. Where the
crime might involve the loss of the life of another person -- the
common call is for a life to be taken in retribution. A
life lost can lead to a life redeemed -- certainly a better bargain
than two lives lost.
I have done a lot of reading preparing
for this subject and one of the things I read was a sermon by a very
famous preacher whose name I’ve unfortunately forgotten. This
preacher’s church was in a part of town where poor people lived in
substandard houses if they were lucky or under bridges if they
weren’t. It was common for the preacher to be hit up for
money by the people in the neighborhood. They knew who he was
and what he was -- a professional man of God. He told the
story of being approached by a panhandler, one he’d seen before and
one to whom he’d given twenty dollars before. The famous
preacher was in a hurry and feeling annoyed at the panhandler.
He checked his pocket and found that he only had a five and a ten on
him. He rather brusquely handed the fifteen dollars to the panhandler
and said, “This is all I have.” The panhandler said nothing
-- took the money and walked off. Then he turned and said to
the famous preacher, “I suppose you’d like me to say thank you.”
“Well, yes,” the famous preacher said. “Some gratitude
would be in order.” “Well,” the panhandler said -- “I’m
not going to thank you. You didn’t give me that money because
you wanted to. You’re a Christian and you gave it to me
because you have to. Your Jesus told you to.” And the
panhandler pointed at the sky.
The famous preacher had a
lot to think about after that.
There is little to cheer about
at getting older -- except the hope that we’ve traded youth and
vigor for some shreds of wisdom. I have a milestone birthday
coming up in a few weeks and now and then I do feel I have gained a
few bits of wisdom. Here’s what I have learned about love in
xx years:
The human capacity to love is limitless -- infinite,
I think. Time is not. It’s when love and time come into
conflict that trouble ensues. In some still undiscovered
dimension time will be relative and able to stretch to meet our needs
but we haven’t worked that out in our current reality. I
don’t know what to do about love and time in conflict. I’m
not that wise yet.
As a father and grandfather I affirm that
there are many “flavors of love.” My love for my sons and
grandsons is a prideful love -- a good kind of pride, but for my
grand-daughters the love I feel is so fiercely intense it constantly
surprises me. I could challenge a mother grizzly’s protective
concern for her cub. I do believe that if that grandfatherly
love energy could be captured and fed into the power grid our
dependence on foreign oil would be erased over night.
This loving business can be -- inconvenient. I’m
talking phileo here. Friends whom it would be more convenient
to love intellectually have a way of intruding and “demanding” to
be loved back. Do you remember the movie “Brokeback
Mountain?” The message for me was -- you can’t help who you
love. Sometimes it’s inconvenient or dangerous -- painful.
You can’t help who you love -- and contrariwise you can’t help
who you don’t love. BUT it doesn’t matter -- you can -- you
must (we are commanded) to agape
love
each other.
This seems like an awful lot of build-up to
the punch line -- but, here you are. How can we be commanded to
love? We can choose
to
love. We start by seeing every human being as a precious child
of God -- just like us. And as we search for the child in that
person -- the child his mother loved -- the child God loves -- we
begin to make the connection that allows us to love in that one-sided
unconditional agape way that Jesus had in mind when he told those of
us who choose to call ourselves Christians to love one another.
There is a common spark of humanity in us all, something warm and
ultimately lovable. Sometimes hidden -- deeply hidden -- but
there, placed there by our common creator God.
Elie Wiesel, a
wise and compassionate man, says. “The opposite of love is not hate
-- it is indifference.”
Love is a virtue -- it is perhaps,
THE virtue.
Indifference is a sin -- it is THE sin. How
awful it is not
to
recognize the common humanity in each other. To look at our
brothers and sisters and not see them.
The quote
from Saint Francis de Sales in the Words to Meditate Upon this
morning gives some practical advice. “We learn to love by
loving.” Practice -- just like any other acquired skill.
Practice. Maybe we can find training wheels for loving.
Maybe that is what churches do.
Love one another. You
can do it. You must do it. Praise God, and AMEN!